- Joined
- Sep 26, 2015
- Messages
- 66
- Reaction score
- 21
- Age
- 39
- Location
- Malibu, CA
- Website
- www.dronetechaerial.com
Hey Everyone,
We have been looking at using D-Log vs D-Cinelike and given our experience level are trying to appeal to others who know more than us on the post processing end. With Log we understand that you are able to obtain more dynamic range and we have been using log->Rec709 luts somewhat successfully. What is D-Cinelike's objective or purpose? From reading around on the Log vs Cinelike debate in regards to the GH4 it appears that everyone claims that the Cinelike is a way easier workflow. With the Log Luts it appears to be just as easy, but we may be doing it wrong as well. Cinelike looks like it burns in more color but still has that flat looking haze on it. Any advice on applications would be appreciated.
Thanks
We have been looking at using D-Log vs D-Cinelike and given our experience level are trying to appeal to others who know more than us on the post processing end. With Log we understand that you are able to obtain more dynamic range and we have been using log->Rec709 luts somewhat successfully. What is D-Cinelike's objective or purpose? From reading around on the Log vs Cinelike debate in regards to the GH4 it appears that everyone claims that the Cinelike is a way easier workflow. With the Log Luts it appears to be just as easy, but we may be doing it wrong as well. Cinelike looks like it burns in more color but still has that flat looking haze on it. Any advice on applications would be appreciated.
Thanks