If I was a customer, I don't think the law would give a **** about me wrt hiring a pilot that was licensed or not. Laws don't protect the customer, they only protect the pilot if he needs one. It makes good professional sense to be licensed and advertise the fact, but a customer just wants the job done for the cheapest price.On my homepage of my website I do have my Cert number that I am licensed and I talk a little bit about operating legally through that license and the various challenges it sometimes presents. My first and main customer clearly stated when she contacted me that there real estate company specifically stressed that they must find people who are licensed. I talked to a friend of mine and he had a good idea to promote my business online and with flyers etc , and explaine the legality information in the advertisement. IDK if that is the best Idea, but its better than reporting I think.
The FAA. Probably won’t do much unless an unsafe condition presents itself. Maybe if the unlicensed pilot advertises they would. But doesn’t sound like the guys you are dealing with are doing thar. The FAA pribay has a lot lot of bigger fish to fry and aren’t really there to police income intrusions.
On the other hand you can blatantly advertise commercial work with better equipment better skills and lower liability for your customer. In the end it’s all about selling yourself and making sure your quality is better that the hobbyist with a new mini that probably won’t continue doing work.
There’s always going to be unscrupulous operators in any business. They tend to sort themselves out over time.
IMHO, unless you know for certain, reporting someone falsely could result in litigation if they are able to find out who reported them. I know firsthand that any business can be tough (especially this business) but I suggest caution.
If you KNOW, then report them. Otherwise it's not worth the effort.Good evening,
I have held a part 107 certification since August 2018. I started my own aerial photography business shortly there after and have been trying to gain traction with work. I have done some work and I have 20+ videos on Vimeo. I live in a tourist town with alot of locally owned and operated business including waterparks, ziplines and many others that could take advantage of aerial media marketing. I am in a bit of a moral dilemma lately seeing more and more local business with aerial work done by someone else. Since I am from the area and grew up here im about 99% sure that what I am seeing is not being done by someone who is licensed. I am not one to report on people but its becoming frustrating especially with over $3500 in equipment and other money spent on startup. Do I just continue to ignore the content that is being used commercially but done without PT107 , or do I start reporting it to the FAA to have them check into it. Its starting to get pretty prevalent and frustrating because Its well know in the area that I do this kind of work.
You can’t get in trouble in the slightest for reporting someone, even if you’re wrong and they DO have a license. This is not a Liable situation and you can’t be sued.
Question to OP, how can you be 90% sure they aren’t licensed? its pretty easy to lookup a person or business on FAA website. If you don’t know the name, then how can you sat they aren't licensed?
I’ve found that in my area, if you think you can’t make money as a licensed pilot because you think non-licensed pilots are stealing your business, you’d be mistaken.
The type of client that wouldn’t bother to care about whether their pilot is licensed or not, aren’t going to pay a price that’s worth it for a pro, so are you really losing that business?
I make quite a bit of money from clients that want quality work and that make it a point to use licensed and insured vendors. It took me a while, but once I got one, well paying client, that led to more and more.
if you’re trying to make money in single home real estate, forget it, there’s no market there. Too many realtors dont want to pay more than $100 for a shoot, OR the realtors have their own Mavics and do it themselves.
Unless you are a lawyer with experience in defamation and/or slander, your opinion is no more valid than mine.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.