Welcome Matrice Pilots!
Join our free DJI Matrice community today!
Sign up

Inspire Pro 1 X5 vs Phantom 3 Pro For Landscape Photography

Joined
Oct 27, 2015
Messages
7
Reaction score
-1
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Website
www.golfpixels.com
I am new to the group and looking at the Inspire Pro 1 for golf course photography. (I own a few golf travel websites so my need is for web photos and I have been expanding to course overview videos)

I currently own the Phantom 3 Pro (huge jump in quality vs P2 and a gopro). My clients have been largely impressed with photos taken. (keep in mind the average guy running a proshop is not a photo critic..LOL)

So my question is will I see a big difference in making the jump from the P3 Pro to an Inspire Pro 1 X5? (clarity of photo, colors, etc) I do some shooting in the golden hours when shadowing gives some depth, not sure if that qualifies as low lighting.

A secondary question and I feel I might make many of you cringe. I typically shoot in jpg. I can pull photos off to my iphone/ipad fast for the client. I love the ability to show photos instantly plus use them instantly for social media. (fb, instagram, etc) I tried shooting in DNG but after exporting them from lightroom into jpg they actually looked worse than the orginal jpg . (maybe I did it wrong)

Next golf season I plan on expanding to video or use some of shots for print. (like scorecards or magazine covers)

So...based on my needs will I see a big jump in quality going to the Inspire X5.

((I been trying to find some unedited photos/jpg on this forum but they are far and few in between at the moment))

Thanks in advance for any suggestions or scoldings.

Brian.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2015
Messages
7
Reaction score
-1
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Website
www.golfpixels.com
Just a quick example of a shot with Phantom 3 Pro in JPG. (the edges are not great..would it be better with Inspire 1 Pro X5? or what else would be an improvement. Any gear/lens recommendations if I pull the trigger to buy the Inspire 1 Pro?

DJI_0221
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
40
Reaction score
3
I have owned both as well as the Inspire 1 and to me the distortion in the P3 and Inspire 1 were worth it when I moved to the Pro. If everything else was equal I would have still made the move. Now, I am at a point where I own a Pro and a 1 but don't really want the 1 as a backup as the IQ isn't the same.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2015
Messages
7
Reaction score
-1
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Website
www.golfpixels.com
I have owned both as well as the Inspire 1 and to me the distortion in the P3 and Inspire 1 were worth it when I moved to the Pro. If everything else was equal I would have still made the move. Now, I am at a point where I own a Pro and a 1 but don't really want the 1 as a backup as the IQ isn't the same.

ddublu - do you have any examples of jpgs uneditied. Or do you shooting in DNG, edit and convert?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
251
Reaction score
87
I would for sure get the x5 if I were you. i mean the x3 creates a pretty nice image, especially if you are only viewing digitally, but if printing the x5 would be a big improvement, or so it would appear from the early photo samples...
I printed a 4 ft. wide panorama using shots from a phantom 3 and while it looked pretty **** good from about 5 ft. away if you look closely it's not quite there.
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Age
56
Location
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Website
www.adamgibbs.com
I should have perhaps mentioned that I have just purchased an Inspire 1 Pro and so far the images from the X5 look very promising. Much of my work goes to print and I also print images up to and above 30 x 40 inches, so the X5 is a good compromise for the work that I do. However like I said if you plan to only post images on the web like you are currently doing then I would save your money. The quality of the Phantom 3 is plenty good enough for your current needs. The example that you posted is a great example of that. Most people except for other photographers are not going to notice image flaws and at the end of the day who cares what other photographers think they are not your clients.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2015
Messages
8
Reaction score
4
Age
65
Location
Blairsville Georgia
Website
www.rotory.com
With regard to quality of the shot there really will be no difference between the Inspire and Phantom 3P I've seen actual comparisons of the P3P X3 & X5 and there really is no difference shooting subject at that distance. What you're getting with the Inspire is the retractable gear and the ability to move the camera 360 degrees. Good luck with your project!
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
26
Reaction score
6
Location
Atlanta, GA
Website
www.action4image.com ; http
Well, I will add my two cents... I really like having both the X3 and the X5 as options. Mostly I do still shots and the X5 with its larger sensor is much much better than the X3 in many cases. Downsize the shots to 2000px though and not so much difference maybe. The X5 still has LOTS of dynamic range though. Another benefit of the X5 (with the new firmware) is you can use a zoom lens and actually zoom in the air (Oly 14-42 pancake lens). With this, you can take say 4 shot panels and create hi-res merges without landing to change lenses or zoom back to get single shot wide images. Sometimes though if you need to do a lot flying maybe the weight of the X3 might be a better choice, which is why I think both cameras have their place. Most of my shots are up, shoot, and back down again so I really like the X5's flexibility.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2015
Messages
8
Reaction score
4
Age
65
Location
Blairsville Georgia
Website
www.rotory.com
I'm happy it's working for you however unless you're doing billboards 16 mp has little value.

Comparing the same exact shot from a P3P, X3 and X5 at our faculty there was virtually no difference in fact the P3 seemed to have improved clarity.

I'm not de-valuing the X5 just saying for most jobs it just represents extra expense.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
26
Reaction score
6
Location
Atlanta, GA
Website
www.action4image.com ; http
Agreed, you make very good points. Here is an example of how much data the X5 actually captures: top is straight out of camera, bottom is edited. (from DNG file).
 

Attachments

  • Example.jpg
    Example.jpg
    291.8 KB · Views: 90
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 8, 2015
Messages
58
Reaction score
12
Age
31
Location
Somerset, UK
The p3 stills are pretty good. If you don't already I'd shoot DNG raw & use adobe lightroom you can tweak them a little. I have the x5 & the p3. I mainly I notice the difference in video. So for stills I would NOT advise buying an X5. Unless you shoot a lot of dawn / dusk or even night. Out of curiosity I'm going to do a side by side print test from the P3 & X5.

Also P3 has longer flight times.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Well, I will add my two cents... I really like having both the X3 and the X5 as options. Mostly I do still shots and the X5 with its larger sensor is much much better than the X3 in many cases. Downsize the shots to 2000px though and not so much difference maybe. The X5 still has LOTS of dynamic range though. Another benefit of the X5 (with the new firmware) is you can use a zoom lens and actually zoom in the air (Oly 14-42 pancake lens). With this, you can take say 4 shot panels and create hi-res merges without landing to change lenses or zoom back to get single shot wide images. Sometimes though if you need to do a lot flying maybe the weight of the X3 might be a better choice, which is why I think both cameras have their place. Most of my shots are up, shoot, and back down again so I really like the X5's flexibility.
Can you let me know where you found the information on the 14-42 zoom lens.. I imagine that is the Panasonic lens
 
Last edited:

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
2,333
Messages
24,198
Members
4,414
Latest member
TimothyCob