Recent content by LJCF

Yes, I don't think Mapper really cares about the M210 in terms of aerial photo processing - even if you manually flew around a shot a dense enough photo image matrix with sufficient overlap. The crux seems to be Capture - which is a very nice tool to integrate directly with Mapper Pro. Did...

My sentiment exactly, I waited 6 months for the 210 to actually become available, spent a few thousand bucks so far in enterprise level PIX4D mapper (monthly) only to find out that what seems to be (one of) the best industry specific aircraft for our world (industrial level surveying and...

I have been advised directly by PIX4D that they currently do not, and have no future plans to allow PIX4D Capture app to work with the M210. That sounds rather strange to say the least - but they are sticking with that story so far......, so I am asking if anyone knows of another current...

Ok, yes that was a bit vague.... 1. Is anyone in the drone world doing it? 2. Is it comparable to using ground control points (cm level) with traditional aerial photogrammetry? I understand it has been around for quite awhile, but have not heard of it yet in the context of flying drones.

OK, thanks - it is hard to understand the benefit (for me at least) to have RTK precision on your craft and not pass that through to what you are imaging???? But, there are many things I don't understand.... Bluelight - any comments of Direct Georeferencing in the drone world?

In reference to the M210RTK, why exactly is it that the accuracy of RTK is not available to the final orthomosaic? Obviously some basic accuracy geolocational data is within the image - to perhaps a couple meters, so can't (or isn't) the RTK data upgraded for use in the final product and...