Recent content by Gary E

Because I had an extra 'v' in the word government? And your response coming from someone that mis-spelled 'NOTAM'. I am not going to respond to a thread poster that is hitting below the belt. Some of your post is uncalled for.

Thanks for the info. I have previously read the 333 requirements and had decided it is not for me. A part of me feels the 333 commits one to agreeing that the FAA proposals, which are in definance of curerent govvernment law, are appropiate to the industry. Whatever it takes to run a business...

My take on the 333 is it's an exemption from rules that are not formal. By getting a 333 the receiver of such is admitting the proposed FAA rules are in acceptance. Regardless, if that is so or not, my take is that the 333 does not give a sUAV an air worthiness certificate. Having a pilots...

Seems like it leaves out operators in the US, since there are no formal sUAV licensing rules from the FAA.